The 2017 Arkansas Archeological Society training program is currently in the field, running from June 10 – 25. We are investigating two sites, 3FR46 and 3FR58, on Ozark National Forest lands along the Mulberry River in Franklin County. The project is a collaborative effort involving the Survey and Society, the Ozark National Forest, and the Cass Work Center.
The Mulberry River study area is located in the Arkansas River Valley upstream from the Carden Bottoms locality where we held the 2009 training program, and downstream from the Spiro locality where the Arkansas and Oklahoma Archeological Surveys are currently collaborating in ongoing investigations. Both of our training program sites are currently maintained under the Forest Service’s Mulberry River Native Vegetation Restoration program.
Both sites were initially recorded in 1972 by Dr. John House (ARAS-UAPB research station archeologist), when he was conducting a survey of the Mulberry River basin in advance of a proposed impoundment project. More recent investigations by Dr. Mary Brennan, Zone Archeologist with the Ozark National Forest, confirmed House’s earlier identification of Woodland and Mississippian components at these sites and retrieved artifact samples, including ceramics, lithics, and charcoal. Brennan’s team also identified potentially related sites in the vicinity, including rock shelters, rock art sites, an argillite quarry, and a possible mound, comprising an ancient cultural landscape reflecting Woodland to Mississippian cultural developments in the region.
Earlier this spring, Survey and Forest Service archeologists conducted a series of preliminary investigations. Dr. Jami Lockhart, with the assistance of Tim Mulvihill, conducted extensive geophysical surveys at both sites, identifying multiple buried features, both natural and cultural. Brennan and Mulvihill then conducted backhoe trenching at 3FR46 and excavated small test units at both sites, confirming the presence of buried cultural materials in geological contexts reflecting human use of a dynamic riverine landscape.
Plans for the training program have specific goals framed by our preliminary findings and Forest Service management needs. We are not, at this point, planning to conduct major excavations. The primary questions to be addressed at 3FR46 and 3FR58 include:
Are intact features and midden deposits preserved at these sites, and if so, in what geomorphological contexts and in what conditions?
What kinds of artifacts and other material remains (animal bone, carbonized plant remains, etc.) are preserved, and what time periods and cultural affiliations do they represent? We are especially interested in finding out if indigenous plant remains are preserved at these sites, so we can determine how this information might contribute to ongoing native vegetation restoration programs.
What kinds of occupations (e.g., short-term seasonal, long-term residential, etc.) are suggested by feature characteristics and distributions, and associated material culture? How does this information contribute to current discussions of Woodland and Mississippian cultural developments in the central Arkansas River Valley?