Figure 1. This engraved whelk shell gorget was found at the Shepherd site (3CL39) in Clark County, Arkansas. Drilled holes at the top indicate that it would have been worn as a necklace.
Figure 1. This engraved whelk shell gorget was found at the Shepherd site (3CL39) in Clark County, Arkansas. Drilled holes at the top indicate that it would have been worn as a necklace.

Mary Beth Trubitt (Arkansas Archeological Survey, Henderson State University Research Station)
Artifact of the Month - December 2019

While they are not commonly found on archeological sites in southwest Arkansas, a variety of marine shell ornaments—earspools, beads, pendants, and gorgets—were used by the ancestral Caddo Indians who lived here between about AD 1000 and 1700. This engraved shell ornament is a gorget, so named because it would have been worn at the throat suspended from a necklace. It has an irregular circular shape, and there are two drilled suspension holes at the top (Figure 1). It was cut from the body whorl of a large whelk shell, presumably lightning whelk, Busycon sinistrum (aka Sinistrofulgur sinistrum) originating from the Gulf Coast (Figure 2). The gorget was engraved on the interior surface with concentric circles and a central four-pointed cross. With an outer segmented band and an interior band filled with punctations, the design recalls the scalloped triskele or Nashville style of engraved shell gorgets more commonly seen in Mississippian contexts in eastern Tennessee (Brain and Phillips 1996; Sullivan 2007).
Figure 2. Modern lightning whelk shell from Florida. The oval shows where a gorget could be cut from the body whorl.
Figure 2. Modern lightning whelk shell from Florida. The oval shows where a gorget could be cut from the body whorl.
Artifact 1974-249 came from the Shepherd site (3CL39) in Clark County, Arkansas. At one time the site had one or two mounds, but was impacted by bulldozing in the mid-1960s, revealing Archaic and Caddo period artifacts. The shell gorget was collected from the site and donated to the Arkansas Archeological Survey’s HSU Research Station in 1974 by Dale Patrick. It was one of two marine shell gorgets from the station’s curated collections that I described in detail in a Caddo Archeology Journal article (Trubitt 2010). In 2018 and 2019, Dr. Patrick donated the remainder of his collection to the Survey’s HSU Research Station, along with notebooks describing his archeological activities from the 1960s when he was a university student. These notes indicate the gorget came from a grave that also contained two ceramic seed jars and a Friendship Engraved bowl, indicating deposition during the Mid-Ouachita phase (AD 1400–1500) of the Caddo period.
This gorget, now considered to be an unassociated funerary object in terms of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), gives us a glimpse into the kinds of ornaments used as identity markers and worn by ancestral Caddos living in the Middle Ouachita River valley in the fifteenth century. While the engraved design on the Shepherd gorget is unusual (Figure 3a), it resembles several other shell gorgets from Caddo sites. One from the Kirkham site, also in Clark County (Figure 3b), was described in an Arkansas Archeologist article by Meeks Etchieson (1981). A similar gorget with scalloped edge, two concentric bands with punctations, and a central curved-line element (Figure 3c), came from a grave at the Sam Kaufman site in Texas (Skinner et al. 1969). The Kirkham gorget has a four-armed tetraskelion at the center while the Sam Kaufman gorget has a three-armed triskele. A gorget described and illustrated by C. B. Moore (1912) from a burial at the Foster Place, on the Red River in southwest Arkansas, has scallops spaced around the outer edge, a band of engraved diamonds, and a cut-out tetraskelion in the center (Figure 3d). The gorgets from the Caddo area are similar but not identical to the triskele or Nashville style gorgets found in eastern Tennessee ca. AD 1350–1450 (such as the one from Hiwassee Island [Lewis and Kneberg 1970], Figure 3e), suggesting wider connections and interactions between the Caddo and Mississippian worlds (Girard et al. 2014).
Figure 3. Shell gorget designs from Caddo sites.
Figure 3. Shell gorget designs from Caddo sites.
Materials: marine shell
Dimensions: 11.2 x 11.7 cm
Age Estimate: AD 1400–1500 (Caddo period, Mid-Ouachita phase)
Curation: Arkansas Archeological Survey, Henderson State University Research Station, Arkadelphia.
Thank you to Chairman Francis of the Caddo Nation of Oklahoma.

* * *

References for Further Reading:
Brain, Jeffrey P., and Philip Phillips, with the assistance of Susan P. Sheldon
1996       Shell Gorgets: Styles of the Late Prehistoric and Protohistoric Southeast. Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University, Peabody Museum Press, Cambridge.
Etchieson, G. Meeks
1981       A Shell Gorget from the Kirkham Site. The Arkansas Archeologist 22:1–3.
Girard, Jeffrey S., Timothy K. Perttula, and Mary Beth Trubitt
2014       Caddo Connections: Cultural Interactions within and beyond the Caddo World. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, Maryland.
Lewis, Thomas M. N., and Madeline Kneberg
1970       Hiwassee Island: An Archaeological Account of Four Tennessee Indian Peoples. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville.
Moore, Clarence B.
1912       Some Aboriginal Sites on Red River. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Second Series, XIV:483–638.
Skinner, S. Alan, R. King Harris, and Keith M. Anderson (editors)
1969       Archaeological Investigations at the Sam Kaufman Site, Red River County, Texas. Contributions in Anthropology No. 5, Department of Anthropology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas.
Sullivan, Lynne P.
2007       Shell Gorgets, Time, and the Southeastern Ceremonial Complex in Southeastern Tennessee. In Southeastern Ceremonial Complex: Chronology, Content, Context, edited by Adam King, pp. 88–106. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.
Trubitt, Mary Beth
2010       Two Shell Gorgets from Southwest Arkansas. Caddo Archeology Journal 20:129–137.

Artifact of the Month Series

A first principle of archeology is that the significance of artifacts depends upon documented information about the context of their discovery. At what site was the artifact found? Can we figure out the age of the artifact? Where was it found in relation to site features (houses, trash deposits, activity areas, etc.) and the distribution of other artifacts? Only with knowledge of those facts can we assess further information about the manufacture and use of artifacts, and their role in other spheres of activity such as social organization, trade and exchange, and religious practice.
In this series, we feature select artifacts that are extraordinary both for the context of their discovery and for their unique qualities that contribute exceptionally important information about Arkansas culture and history. New artifacts will be added monthly. Find the list of artifacts here.